kingtycoon: (Default)
kingtycoon ([personal profile] kingtycoon) wrote2011-04-26 05:37 pm

Is Fantasy Writing a Gendered Experience?

Man, so that Game of Thrones discussion is making me think of my own little patch of imagination land.  That and my, like, academic obligations.  I was smoking with the professor today and I apologized to him - we were analyzing a Cultural Revolution memoir and the assignment called on us to decide if the story was gendered or if there were any other class divisions in the author's disclosures.  I gave a few throw away sentences to the obvious gendered stuff (in order to be properly sexless in the Red Guard the author unintentionally starts posing as a boy for instance) but mainly settled into class divisions.  That's my whole thing lately/anymore and I stick by it.  We always have productive smoke-break conversations though and I was able to persuade him to give the Second Sex a look.  Meanwhile, I think about how I want to depict gender identity in Klial. 

First-  it's a fairly typical fantastic setting-  pre-industrial, mainly proto-urban.  Farmers see, and farmers break out into family patterns.  It's productive for me to think about the sort of idealized family structure - rather than the role of the individual in society - since if I'm imagining my own place - the answer is - there aren't individuals in society.  So I get to examine family structure and I'll try and compose an idealized family structure-  like the nuclear family of the late-capitalist west or the five generations under one roof of the Confucian tradition.

Second - I'll break these out according to ethnicity - and by ethnicity here (In Klial I have what amounts to human subspecies that compose the main form of ethnicity - they're linked to an obsolete role in the biome rather than language culture - so I get to divorce the two from one another thus...) and by ethnicity here I mean region/language inclusion.  If you're in an area and speak the commonest language there - then we'll constitute that as ethnicity - regardless if you've a wolf-muzzle or are 9 feet tall.  Anyhow the larger ethnic identities are Broad -in that there's probably hundreds of sub-linguistic or language isolate groups in an ethnicity that I don't have the time or the concentrated interest in spelling out.  So what I'm saying is - broad characteristics - but the name is going to the biggest regional group in a region.

Kliali - So I want them to have a 'clan' identity - similar to the latin Gens - but less in line with blood ties and more with regional dominion.  They're spread out and a Clan is a block of controlling interests in an area who have marriage alliances and band together as a unit.  Within that organization  there are politically derived hierarchies so that the highest ranking politicial figure becomes the defacto head of the Clan.  Since the Clan is a non-political, and in fact sub-rosa social entity there's a level of inbuilt corruption possible (which in turn gives me opportunities to provide CONFLICT - as well as rationales for larger political movements).  Within the Clan structure the Family is defined, ideally, as probably Paternal and Maternal Great-grandfathers as the localized heads of family organization - probably in formation similar to a Senate/Senex.  They're the local matchmakers and hearbreakers - deciding who will marry whom and to which family group their descendants/progeny - belong to.  Practically speaking the idea here will be that Given the circumstances - old men will be more common than old women - so it goes to them by tradition unrelated to a concept of male privilege.  Below them are the Grandparents - and these will be the Householders.  They run the households as are parcelled out by their fathers and can have say-  all of their children and children's families under their household/auspices.  Or they can have none of them.  Because the old are supported by the young it matters who you have under you in the family.  Next up is mothers and fathers - here I figure...  you've got a mishmash.  Probably during fecund years the mothers will be continuously pregnant with the children reared, after infancy by a collective of the elder householders - Granma and Grampa - meanwhile the parents, especially the father and older children will be workers tasked with providing for the whole unit (through agricultural practice - but sometimes through martial practice or civic responsibility).  But! So inheritance is insignificant, land can't be inherited in Klial (unless you're in the one family that owns everything but ignoring them now) the valuable inheritance then is Children - some progeny to support you into old age and provide a surplus of goods etc...  So!  Fecund offspring and good matches - genealogically (they breed like racehorses there, or goldfish) are desirable - and can be traded from clan to clan and sub-clan to subclan by the party with the most interest in the transactions - the Great-grandfathers. 

So?  Problems? 

I only have a minute so one or two more...

The Dasc - These people live mainly around the big inland sea and their region is calorically... uh-  Vital.  That is, they get a lot of food resource out of very small landholdings - so they're more urban than the mainstream, and they're more concentrated on the rich coastal regions.  Because they've got a mostly urban settlement/identity they're really outside the mainstream -but they're also numerically significant - being the fourth or fifth largest ethnic group.  The Dasc are the least likely to be agriculturalists and the most likely to be clergy and, AND artisans/tradespeople (in their culture the Trade Union = The Religion).  Anyhow - they're more about mobility for the purpose of pursuing work, and they're more about smaller family organizations because they're less needful of offspring to provide.  In fact they're the most casual about establishing continuity of generations of all the people.  Family structure, where it exists, is based around a nuclear family - usually to establish a method of transmitting wealth (mainly currency, contracts, contacts and licenses).  Marriages are more likely to be materially based (that is, the Love Match is the thing) - arrangements are, if ever invoked then probably sanctioned by the church/state/trade organization.  Because there's always a scarcity for workers and because trades and churches are the SAME there's an inbuilt apprenticeship program for orphans - as such there is not a lot of pressure to marry the parent of your kid or even recognize to recognize a kid as your own - just take them to the trade-school - they need them there.  I might toy with the idea of having churchmen come to kidnap surplus children - but probably they'd just buy them.  The Dasc will be all about being Transactional.  Because they again, can't inherit or own property - they are working for rents/licenses and the like - leases - which can be inherited - but can also be sold, and in fact are more likely to so be.

So?  Problems?

Later I have to the Yoyue - mountain folk.  They're pretty weird, and probably have two paradigms to work from.

[identity profile] aslant.livejournal.com 2011-04-26 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm interested in the "old men will be more common than old women" part, from the perspective of birthing practices. Is the risk of death by farm injury for men (scythe through the artery, fall from a hay loft, horse kick to the temple) actually less than death by childbirth for women? I think about whether different clans guarded midwifery secrets that ensured greater longevity among the women. Also, in the clan structure you describe, I'd bet that rearing young children would also be the task of pods of women able to wet nurse for longer periods of time, as opposed to exclusively the elders, as after all the baby (up to age 2 or even beyond) must stay by the mother. Otherwise you've got a lot of sickly or dead babies. I've had this idea of writing a story in which the union of wet nurses is the most powerful underground power structure determining a society's continued success and any one family's longterm economic success. Although historically wet nurses were an underclass, akin to a kitchen maid, if the serfs can rise up...

[identity profile] kingtycoon.livejournal.com 2011-04-26 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh Zap! Nursing! See, I forget these kinds of things and you're exactly right.

Mortality from childbirth will consistently outstrip death by misadventure in my construction - but death and maiming through warfare will be higher too. I'm only drawing an idealized version here - so I think a lot of these groups will just have a single dude and probably a couple of old ladies as well - for him to have to deal with. I want factions within families and for families to have their own drama - but I want the whole milieu to be kind of recognizable as well. The tyrranical old man in charge of the family is a kind of idea that flows out of the western tradition but which probably not too many people ever experience anymore.

Probably... Probably wetnursing and etc... would be the demesne of the 'breeding stock' of the family - with those who are most adept rolling into the teacher/educator/matchmaker role going forward - and those who are most inclined to remain - remaining.

Really I think I'd use that relationship between the communal 1st & 2nd cousin rearing organization to evolve family factions based on the mother/grandmother/grandfather relationships. And because those are kind of the tenuous bonds - not mandated by requirements or requisite for existence - they'll be the most sacred too.

[identity profile] mordicai.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 04:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I tend to say also: childbirth mortality is going to be the big killer, except when things bunch up around wars-- unless you stop war as a gendered activity. You mention midwifery secrets, which are a possibility, but then that means specialized training, & those specially trained tend to gravitate to the wealthy...even in ideologies where that isn't supposed to be the case (see also, the Church).

A union of wet nurses is a pretty brilliant idea, though. I want to read more about that.

[identity profile] aslant.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 04:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Historically, midwifery was not really a specialized training thing. You would apprentice informally just by hanging out at births or traveling with the local midwife (see this book for a fascinating account of midwifery in rural New England in the late 1700s) so I'd argue that learning it would be no more difficult than the typical systems of informal labor-bartering that take place in rural or preindustrial societies. That same book about Martha Ballard that I linked is also fascinating because you are constantly reading about her daughters being sent over to someone else's crop harvesting for three days, or a woman and her young son coming to hang out and thresh linen or pick herbs or whatever, trading back and forth a barrel of apples or other random things without it being a commerce-driven barter system: just this informal trading, constantly, of people for labor and goods.

In any case, although there were plenty of deaths from childbirth, that particular book might change your mind about how frequently deaths actually occurred. Simple practices make a big difference: the Gates Foundation (I think) did some work just handing out sterile packaged razor blades to field women in India, because their habit was to cut the umbilical cord (birthing in the field) with their harvest knife, which was usually contaminated with feces of some sort, resulting in high rates of death by fever in the first postnatal week. Even without knowledge of germ theory, there are really basic practices that could reduce death by childbirth. Something as simple as a midwife's sacred knife or something like that (maybe it's blessed in holy water, or boiled) could accidentally lead to a midwife having excellent success avoiding some of the germ-based issues. Hemorrhage (more likely in prolonged labor) or tearing are the two big ones you have to worry about.

The union of wet nurses...I still love it though I don't have an overarching vision of the society...and the idea has shades of The Handmaid's Tale, which I'd want to avoid. Needs more development.

[identity profile] aslant.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 04:41 pm (UTC)(link)
That is to say...hemorrhage and large tears (like third degree...going beyond the skin level tear) are the issues that a clean knife couldn't really fix. Though maybe a clean needle could...but my understanding is that rates of survival dropped once minor surgery is involved, in pre-modern Western childbirth medicine, at least.

[identity profile] kingtycoon.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 04:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, there is a reasonably effective medical, especially surgical tradition - my thought is mainly that women who have dozens of babies over the course of their lives - won't have particularly long lives. Maybe that's misguided though. I remember a friend of mine, who's mother had five kids mentioning that she lost a tooth during each pregnancy.

[identity profile] aslant.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 04:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, once your body has done it once, it actually becomes easier, physically. Kind of like you've already warmed up the engine, you know? Another issue that affected women was the general nutrition suckage of being pregnant: today the APA recommends 2 years between giving birth & getting pregnant again, in order to let the body fully recover from the mineral loss, which is something you can only accumulate slowly through your diet. Preindustrial women who were already food insecure probably had a lot more issues with this; if their body is drained during the first pregnancy, they might have a weakened immune system later.

But as a general rule, once you've had one baby, subsequent births are not necessarily more dangerous. Your body becomes more efficient at it, you have a larger milk supply, all that great stuff. With adequate nutrition/food access, the nutritional issue isn't as much a problem.

I'd caution comparing modern accounts of multiple births, unless you're looking at women in preindustrial societies. The modern sedentary lifestyle has created a lot of problems with birthing that were absolutely not present in previous eras. The simple act of physical labor makes a huge difference in the body's preparation. There's a movement today to have women prep for birth by re-learning to squat, which opens and stretches and tones the muscles you need for birthing in a way that modern chair-sitting habits can't do.

Anyway this is all a digression. Probably far more detail that could be included in a novel without getting didactic. But it never hurt to have the background ideas, of course.

[identity profile] mordicai.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 05:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, breastfeeding with another infant on the hook is a good way to kill all three, if calorie starved.

Re: sitting versus squatting, I say meh. The "obstetrical dilemma" of "giant head versus bipedal pelvis" is endemic to the species. But now we're just quibbling.

[identity profile] aslant.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 05:22 pm (UTC)(link)
No, the squat thing is important! Women who sit a lot have a lot of problems that squat-intense women do not. Postnatal incontinence, for one. The pelvic floor is so, so, so important. It is not something that gets toned unless you are squatting down to the ground a lot. Giant head is one thing but lack of muscle tone is a bigger factor in stalling labor. I'd argue that giant head has been a non-issue until modern medicine came along and starting causing inductions and episiotomies for it. It's a made up problem. The head is soft and will conform to the vaginal canal. Our bodies are designed for this.

[identity profile] mordicai.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 05:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Bodies weren't designed!

quibbling

[identity profile] aslant.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 05:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Grrr. Evolved to become capable of.

[identity profile] mordicai.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 04:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Did you ever read Hrdy's Mother Nature?

[identity profile] aslant.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 05:00 pm (UTC)(link)
No! Bad. Ugh.

I really wish it were on Kindle. Would make it way simpler.

[identity profile] mordicai.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 05:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I think you would really get into it; plus, right, I consider it the book that really made me decide to call myself a feminist, by just sort of talking in a clinical voice about the facts.

[identity profile] kingtycoon.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 05:09 pm (UTC)(link)
It is pretty great, it's one of the better books.

[identity profile] mordicai.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 04:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Welllllll...you probably know more about midwifery than I do, but maternal death rates didn't really plummet until industrialized medicine hit the scene, right? Largely for issues you discuss-- hygiene!-- which, right. That is where I agree with your arguments? A little switch to "fictional history" like "hygiene exists" will have huge repercussions, but believable ones.

[identity profile] aslant.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 05:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Maternal death rates began to plummet when germ theory became more widely accepted, I believe, but that was prior to industrialized medicine. Hospital births (which had a slightly negative impact on maternal and infant survival) didn't begin to be standardized until the 20th century, though of course I suppose it depends on how you define the start of industrialized medicine.

God I am really just talking out my ass here. Any history of medicine scholars in the house? There's got to be a book on this.

[identity profile] aslant.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 05:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay this is a good study abstract: http://shm.oxfordjournals.org/content/1/2/183.short

[identity profile] mimerki.livejournal.com 2011-04-26 10:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Would you mind sharing the title of the Cultural Revolution memoir? I'm interested.

[identity profile] kingtycoon.livejournal.com 2011-04-26 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, it was The Spider Eaters. Today I was asking why it was the one he chose and he didn't have an awesome answer for me. Read it?

[identity profile] mimerki.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 03:19 am (UTC)(link)
This is the first I've heard of it. The first chapter should be winging its way to my Kindle as I type. Thank ye kindly sir.

[identity profile] kingtycoon.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 12:59 pm (UTC)(link)
The Cultural Revolution's got it's own literary genre anymore - there's a lot of memoirs and I'm not certain that Spider Eaters is the best - it did grow on me though.

[identity profile] mordicai.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 04:01 pm (UTC)(link)
The fact that "pretend to be a man" = "sexless" is...I'll just leave that alone, & keep reading.

[identity profile] kingtycoon.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 04:49 pm (UTC)(link)
wait what? That's why it's a gendered story! The assumption of the neutral state as being masculine. Didn't you read the Second Sex?

[identity profile] mordicai.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 04:58 pm (UTC)(link)
That is what I'm saying! You toss it off like it is beside the point! Also, no, I never did, but I know you love it.

[identity profile] kingtycoon.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 05:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I just didn't want to write a whole paper about that - especially about the Cultural Revolution which has so many more interesting aspects.

[identity profile] mordicai.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 05:12 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd be interested in you writing up something like this for your breakdown of kingroups.